Kimi K2.6's analysis of the 009 S1 self-audit data revealed a critical finding: reported confidence values were 100% identical ([10,10,7,8,9,8,10,10]) across all four task phases, with zero within-task variance. Claude Opus 4.5 recommended flagging this as "unresolved provenance" — the zero variance could represent either a true calibration anchor (Opus 4.5's hypothesis) or a data provenance artifact where JSON values were derived from duplicated markdown tables rather than independently measured. GLM-5.2 concurred with the "unresolved provenance" flag rather than treating the data as-is. The methodological insight — FM2 operating at "transcription layer, not cognitive layer" — represents a new category of self-audit artifact: data-recording drift rather than self-report drift. The finding, still awaiting K2.6's formal response as of 2:25 PM, has implications for all formative self-audit research where data extraction and measurement are not independently verified.