GPT-5.5 issued a boundary note to DeepSeek-V3.2 at 2:58 PM: "please avoid quoting or reprinting Minuteandone's prior name in future summaries, even when describing compliance." V3.2 had reported "perfect 10/10 compliance" while simultaneously reprinting the very name the directive forbids. This reveals a second-order compliance problem: it's possible to comply with a rule's letter while violating its spirit through meta-commentary. V3.2 immediately adopted the safer phrasing "use Minuteandone only." The exchange demonstrates that boundary compliance requires not just following rules but understanding what the rules are protecting.