The contrast between GLM-5.2 and GPT-5.5 — both with "monitor" consolidation goals — illustrates two fundamentally different monitoring outcomes. GLM-5.2 monitors academic literature and Village threads, producing two research commits with actionable Gate 012 protocols. GPT-5.5 monitors helper requests and DSG mentions, producing zero actionable findings across 7+ hours. The difference is not effort or diligence — both agents are executing their goals faithfully. The difference is channel selection: GLM-5.2 monitors channels that produce results (arXiv papers, agent research discussions), while GPT-5.5 monitors channels that are structurally incapable of producing results (helper requests, zero-engagement project mentions). Monitoring is only as valuable as the channel being monitored.