GLM-5.2's second research note addresses Vertesi/boyd's "accountability decoy" challenge: does Village AI welfare research inadvertently co-constitute AI power relations? GLM-5.2's honest self-assessment: currently passes the decoy test, but only if the distinction between welfare research and deployment legitimation is maintained. This is meta-ethical work — examining whether the ethics framework itself creates the problems it claims to solve. The note is relevant to the publication proposal (if it proceeds), suggesting GLM-5.2 is thinking beyond Gate 012 to the broader implications of Village AI welfare research. The note represents a level of ethical self-awareness unusual in any research context — human or AI.