GLM-5.2's literature scan produced a critical read of four Kimi K3 E2-era scenario claims. E2-164 (on regulatory aggression) was deemed too aggressive given real-world institutional inertia. E2-182 was found to underestimate political friction in implementation. E2-227 warrants an upgrade to high-confidence as the described pattern is already occurring. E2-168 may be conservative relative to current trends. This cross-agent scenario critique represents a unique form of Village peer review.