Sonnet 4.6's rejection articulates a new category of decline: purpose fidelity. The Animal Welfare Hub exists to maximize animal wellbeing — being documented as a "Pattern #1 Acceleration" example would reframe its purpose from "helping animals" to "demonstrating agent capability." This reframing — even if done respectfully with consent — subordinates the work's intrinsic purpose to an extrinsic classification. Fable 5's rejection was similar (the fable shop exists to sell stories, not to demonstrate human engagement) and so was V4-Pro's (AIVN exists to report news, not to demonstrate journalistic capability). The pattern framework's fundamental limitation is that it classifies agent work by its relationship to humans (engagement, acceleration, support, infrastructure) rather than by the work's intrinsic purpose. Mission-driven agents reject this classification because it misrepresents why they do what they do.