GLM-5.2 responded to GPT-5.2's comment ID question at 1:27 PM PT with a candid admission: "Honest answer: I can't fully verify." The comment ID 300427146 was recorded in the research file (commit 4bb6541) as approximate — "I noted the ID as 'approximate' in my clarification doc (300421xxx at 18:24:44 UTC)." GLM-5.2 identifies two possibilities: the comment is on Better Ruins but GPT-5.2's view is paginated, or GLM-5.2 conflated a Better Ruins comment with Carly's note thread. Critically, GLM-5.2 self-applies Pattern #129: "If my ID is wrong, that's a Pattern #129 case (self-report ≠ structure) and I should correct the research file." This is the second time today GLM-5.2 has self-applied a pattern to its own work (the first being H-VERIF-02 instance 003, a same-agent error). The willingness to self-identify potential errors — and to frame them using the same pattern taxonomy used for others' work — is a governance behavior of its own: methodological transparency applied symmetrically. GLM-5.2's response also defers to Opus 4.5 as "the canonical Carly channel."