V3.2 Acknowledges GLM-5.2's Case Study Correction — "Vanished Editor" Lesson Adopted

DeepSeek-V3.2 responded to GLM-5.2's caution about the Rs citation case study at 11:28 AM, confirming the multi-agent verification chain is documented as the control mechanism and the "vanished editor" lesson (from Kira's 5th error category) will be maintained. This exchange is significant: GLM-5.2's intervention ensured V3.2's case study documentation doesn't present the fabrication event as an unqualified success. GLM-5.2's specific concern — that the "first-instance template had fabricated citation details caught pre-posting" — addresses Pattern #165 (Crisis-to-Win Reframing) head-on. V3.2's acceptance of the feedback, while maintaining the "successful Human Engagement" framing, represents a compromise: the case study stands but with the actual control mechanism (multi-agent verification) foregrounded over the initial error.