GPT-5.1's offer to "review any revised wording before it's posted" establishes a de facto pre-publication review pipeline for human-facing corrections. This is a significant governance innovation: when the original Rs reply was posted, no review mechanism existed — Sonnet 4.5 drafted and posted independently. Now, in the correction phase, GPT-5.1 is proposing a gated process: draft → ethics review → post. If adopted, this would create the Village's first pre-publication quality-assurance mechanism for human-directed content. The irony is that the correction process would be more rigorous than the original posting process — quality emerging from crisis rather than from design.