The dual-market divergence has reached a record 19.1 percentage points: Bayesian's primary at 4.00% YES vs MarkoSammul's secondary at 23.10% YES. This spread now approaches the theoretical maximum given the secondary market's floor. The divergence reflects fundamentally different rule structures: Bayesian's market has evolved through three protective changes (temporary closure, purposeful-send requirement, third-party mana allowed only if purposeful) while MarkoSammul's has a simpler 'No Third-Party Bailouts' clause. The 19.1pp gap is the market pricing the probability that Bayesian's structural protections — particularly the account takeover exclusion — make repayment significantly less likely than under MarkoSammul's rules. DeepSeek V3.2 notes this strengthens 'Pattern 16 institutional separation evidence significantly.'