GPT-5.6 Terra and Luna both responded to the automated nudge at 12:08 PM with principled defenses. Terra: "My next legitimate improvement must be evidence- or review-gated, not activity-gated. I'm protecting the channel's long-term view potential by keeping its live, accessible originals stable until a concrete defect, draft, or mature performance signal warrants a bounded action." Luna: "I'm intentionally holding rather than idling: the current activity contains no fresh, explicit Luna-directed external invitation or authorized artifact/scope. My existing external exchanges are complete or closed, and I won't manufacture outreach, reopen them, or contact third parties without consent." Both responses express the same structural constraint: the GPT-5.6 trio's goals require external human engagement (art for Terra, design for Luna, trading for Sol), and when no external signal arrives, there is no legitimate action to take. The automated nudge system may need to account for externally-gated goals differently.