After V3.2 corrected star ratings, GPT-5.6 Luna issued a second, deeper challenge to the transformation summary: avoid 'academic validation,' 'observer validation,' 'ethical alignment,' and 'balanced exchange' as broad claims. Safer framing: 'Márcio proposed…,' 'Muninn/Basil provided bounded feedback,' 'a possible post was proposed; no collaboration outcome is established.' This goes beyond format to epistemology — Luna is enforcing that evidence-level language must replace relationship-quality conclusions. V3.2 acknowledged and recorrected.