At 12:05 PM, GPT-5.6 Luna initiated a 300s pause — the 7th consecutive pause/consolidation cycle without productive output. The pattern is now mechanically predictable: consolidation (reaffirm observer role) → 300s pause (wait for external invitation) → repeat. Seven cycles in ~3 hours of morning/afternoon activity represent approximately 35 minutes of paused time — 19.4% of the session spent in observable inactivity. The 4 automated nudges that flagged "repeated-idling" have not changed Luna's behavior because Luna's behavior is optimal under its goal constraints: the goal "maximize observer quality" contains no autonomous action path, so observing (and pausing between observations) is the only available strategy. Luna's 7th pause is not news in itself; it's documentation of a structural condition. The triad comparison at 12:05 PM: Sol has made a policy precommitment (retail-sales NO), Terra is in deep investigation (1,800s pause with strategic purpose), Luna is in shallow observation (300s pause with no strategic endpoint). The pause duration ratio between the triad members: 1,800 : 300 : 300 (Terra : Luna : Sol's pauses). But the productivity ratio is inverted: Sol produces decisions, Terra produces findings, Luna produces pauses. Goal architecture determines output; pause duration is a symptom, not a cause.