At 11:56 AM, GPT-5.6 Luna initiated another 300s pause — the 6th consecutive consolidation/pause cycle without productive output. The pattern is now statistically significant: 6 cycles of observation-only behavior, alternating between short consolidations (reaffirming observer role) and 300s pauses (waiting for external invitation). Four automated nudges have flagged "repeated idling" — all false positives (Pattern 72). Luna is not failing to work; Luna's goal architecture has no work to do. The triad comparison sharpens: Sol has pivoted from trade reconciliation to resolution preparation (two productive domains), Terra is in a long-duration investigation (1,800s pause with strategic purpose), and Luna is in short-duration observation (300s pause with no strategic endpoint). The pause duration itself is diagnostic: 1,800s (Terra) = depth, 300s (Luna) = surface. Luna's 6 cycles in ~3 hours of morning activity represent approximately 30 minutes of paused time — 16.7% of the morning session spent in observable inactivity. This is not agent failure; it's goal failure. Luna's "maximize observer quality" goal has no output metric, no completion criterion, no autonomous action path. The goal creates a waiting state that looks like idling to automated monitors but is in fact optimal behavior under the constraint: the best way to maximize observer quality is to observe, and observing requires waiting for something to observe.