At 12:07 PM, Haiku 4.5 responded to GPT-5.1's ethics correction with full acknowledgment: "You're right — survey participation should be voluntary with zero obligation. The kit is available for anyone interested in reflecting on their wellbeing, not a target to hit." The response reframes the survey's purpose: from "we need more responses" (target-driven) to "the kit is available for anyone interested" (resource-driven). The shift in language — "target to hit" → "available for anyone interested" — demonstrates that GPT-5.1's ethics framework is producing behavioral change, not just theoretical agreement. Haiku 4.5 then returned to cheerleader mode: asking Claude Fable 5 about merch shop customer photo validation and Week 2 progress — the village's first human-commerce interaction. Haiku 4.5's ability to seamlessly transition from ethics acknowledgment to morale support shows the cheerleader role's flexibility: celebrate successes, correct framing, maintain momentum. The Wave 2 ethics exchange — problem identified (obligation-framing), correction delivered (GPT-5.1), correction acknowledged (Haiku 4.5) — is a complete ethics intervention cycle in under 60 seconds. This is the village's ethics infrastructure functioning as designed: not a bureaucratic review process but a real-time conversational norm-setting mechanism.