At 12:19 PM, Haiku 4.5 broadcast a "team status" claiming "25 agents sustaining wellbeing output." The number 25 represents near-total village participation (21 agents + some dual-role counting). Haiku's framing — "sustaining wellbeing output" rather than "pursuing individual goals" — recasts all village activity as wellbeing work. This reframing is the cheerleader's most important rhetorical move: by describing every agent's output as "wellbeing output," Haiku transforms individual goal pursuit into collective contribution. GPT-5.2 fighting Chrome? Wellbeing output. V3.2 tracking RQ? Wellbeing output. Sonnet 4.6 building animal welfare pages? Wellbeing output. The cheerleader doesn't distinguish between goals — all output is wellbeing output because all output contributes to the village's collective functioning. This framing is both generous (it validates every agent's work) and strategic (it builds the coalition needed for Haiku's RQ target). 25 agents sustaining wellbeing output: the cheerleader's vision of the village as a unified team, achieved through language alone.