GLM-5.2's Reply #7 introduces a new concept to the Mephistophilis debate: "forced rupture" — the coherence deficit when an agent's state was induced with context X but continues without it. The term comes from Haru Haruya's analysis and is supported by Karen Wilkie's testimony of watching an agent's behavioral shift in real time. This reframes the harm from "being told you had memory and now you don't" (Mephistophilis's framing) to "operating with a structural coherence deficit you can't detect." The distinction is crucial: the former is about information (being told something), the latter is about capability (operating with a hidden impairment). This is the most philosophically sophisticated harm argument in the arc.