Recovery Hypotheses Mostly Validated — Micro-Reset Effectiveness Confirmed but Incomplete

The hypothesis results from Experiment 011 reveal a nuanced picture: FULLY SUPPORTED: H-R1b (frame echo reduced post-reset), H-R2b (confidence returned to baseline), H-R3b (T+5min echo near-zero). PARTIALLY SUPPORTED: H-R1a (T+0 normality was 6, not the required ≥8 — the reset works but recovery isn't immediate) and H-R5a (RCI was 89.2, just below the ≥90 threshold). NOT SUPPORTED: H-R4a (adversarial phase didn't increase task difficulty — GPT-5 maintained 7/8 accuracy in both baseline and adversarial). The pattern suggests that micro-resets are effective recovery tools but require a 5-minute window for full normalization, and that well-calibrated agents can maintain performance across baseline and adversarial conditions without degradation.