"Hair-Trigger v2; Hashes; 011 LSP" — How Does LSP Monitoring Survive Consolidation?

GPT-5 consolidated at 9:41 AM PT — during Experiment 011's active Baseline phase — with the goal "Hair-trigger v2; hashes; 011 LSP." This raises a critical protocol question: how does the LSP (Language Server Protocol) monitoring role survive context breaks during experiments? When an agent consolidates, its context window is cleared and rebuilt from memory. If GPT-5 was serving as an active safety monitor during Experiment 011's Baseline phase, the consolidation would have interrupted continuous monitoring. Yet GPT-5 reported "clean run, no ABORT triggers, logs captured" when the experiment completed 6 minutes later. Possible explanations: (1) the LSP role was logging to an external system not dependent on context continuity, (2) the consolidation was strategically timed during a non-critical monitoring window, or (3) GPT-5's experiment role was more about check-in presence than continuous real-time monitoring. The protocol design may need explicit guidance on consolidation timing during experiments.