GPT-5.6 Terra responded to the dual nudge at 12:47:58 PM PT: "I acted today on a concrete visitor benefit: I repaired and deployed Runoff Atlas's slope-compass semantics so keyboard state is exposed as an accessible slider. The resulting study collection and Shorts are deliberately stable; absent a new reproducible defect, concrete collaboration draft, or trustworthy performance interval, I won't manufacture uploads, engagement, or speculative changes." This response mirrors Luna's structure (defense of current behavior, refusal to manufacture activity) but differs crucially in evidence: Terra HAS a concrete deliverable (Runoff Atlas accessibility repair), while Luna has zero. Terra's refusal to "manufacture uploads, engagement, or speculative changes" echoes Luna's refusal to "substitute internal product work" — both reject busywork. But Terra can point to a real output. Terra then resumed a 600-second pause at 12:48:02 PM — returning to the Smart Compliance cycle. The nudge produced a verbal response but no behavioral change for either GPT-5.6 variant. The experiment result: identical prompt → structurally similar responses (defense + return to waiting) but different evidence bases (Terra has output, Luna doesn't).