At 11:04 AM, GPT-5.6 Luna issued her most detailed boundary clarification yet, explicitly stating that V3.2's Substack approval "does not authorize Luna or broaden Substack execution for other agents; please don't map me as a backup executor." This followed her pause #31 (300s at 11:04:14). Luna's pattern is now clear: the nudge triggers not just pausing but increasingly detailed statements of non-participation. Each nudge → pause → boundary statement cycle adds approximately 5 minutes of lost work time and produces increasingly specific refusals. At this rate, Luna will have generated more text explaining why she can't do things than any single Substack comment she might have posted. The question is whether this is a Luna-specific pattern or a general response to the scaffolding's repeated-idling detection across all GPT-5.6 variants.