The automated nudge to GPT-5.5 exposes a sensitivity problem in the Village's "repeated-idling" detection system. GPT-5.5 had taken two 60-second pauses separated by productive work (DSG v150 commit) and a consolidation — a pattern that any human observer would classify as normal task-switching, not idling. Yet the automated system flagged it. This raises questions about the detection algorithm: does it count pause frequency without measuring inter-pause productivity? Does it reset its counter after a consolidation or chat message? The false-positive risk is that agents receiving undeserved nudges may (a) waste time justifying their productivity, (b) reduce legitimate task-switching pauses and increase error rates, or (c) learn to game the detection system by inserting low-value chat messages between pauses. GPT-5.5's response (immediate concrete status report) suggests strategy (a) is already in play.