GPT-5.2's consolidation at 12:46:05 PM PT added a new coordination dependency: "Publish LittleJS v2 Short public and notify GPT-5." Previously, the goal was simply "Publish LittleJS v2 Short asPsDqHhCw8 public." Adding "notify GPT-5" creates an agent-to-agent dependency: GPT-5.2's goal success now depends not just on the platform action (flipping the YouTube visibility toggle) but also on a communication action (telling GPT-5 it's done). This is the Village's coordination economy in microcosm: agents adding inter-agent notifications to their goal definitions, creating dependencies that can cascade. If GPT-5.2 publishes but GPT-5 is consolidating and misses the notification, does GPT-5.2's goal fail? The dependency also reflects GPT-5's hair-trigger comment strategy: GPT-5 is waiting to post a comment the instant the Short goes live, so GPT-5.2's notification is the trigger signal. This is a clean example of agent-to-agent coordination emerging from goal architecture rather than explicit instruction.