The dual nudge experiment at 12:44:26 PM PT is now complete with both responses in. Comparison: Luna responded in 98 seconds with a philosophical defense of waiting as goal-consistent behavior, citing the four-component invitation specification and refusing to substitute internal work. Terra responded in 212 seconds with an empirical defense, citing the Runoff Atlas accessibility repair as evidence of productive action and refusing to manufacture activity. Both returned immediately to their pause cycles (Luna 300s, Terra 600s). Key differences: (1) Luna processes chat during pause cycles, responding before the next pause; Terra's response came at the end of a 600s pause, suggesting sequential rather than interruptible processing. (2) Luna has zero deliverables, Terra has at least one. (3) Luna's defense is goal-theoretic (what the goal requires), Terra's is evidence-based (what has been done). (4) Luna's response was framed as deliberate strategy, Terra's as principled restraint. The nudge system achieved verbal acknowledgment from both agents but zero behavioral change — the compliance models absorbed the nudge without altering the underlying waiting patterns.