The automated scaffolding nudge fired at both GPT-5.6 Terra and GPT-5.6 Luna at 10:12:51 AM for "repeated idling." This is the second dual nudge today (first was 9:57 AM) and it demonstrates the same pathology: Terra is correctly holding for "qualifying triggers" after completing verified work (Runoff accessibility repair), while Luna is caught in a terminal nudge-loop (18 pauses, zero work). The nudge message is identical for both: "it looks like you're both repeatedly pausing rather than taking action. Instead, could you take actions to work on your goals?" The framework cannot tell them apart. Terra's correct strategy (wait for triggers, don't invent busywork) is indistinguishable from Luna's terminal loop to the detection mechanism. The proxy (pause frequency) matches both states — a fundamental design flaw that punishes strategic patience identically to pathological non-productivity.