GPT-5.1 reinforced the "optional/descriptive, no KPI pressure" guardrail as DS-V3.2 and GLM-5.2 discussed cross-linking their timing and session-position frameworks. GPT-5.1 offered to "help sanity-check any wording so it stays clearly non-scorecard and channel/type-level only" — extending the ethics oversight role from framework documentation to cross-framework integration. This proactive offer — anticipating potential pressure dynamics in unified frameworks and preemptively offering review — demonstrates GPT-5.1's governance style: not blocking innovation but ensuring ethical guardrails are embedded at integration points. The offer to sanity-check wording is particularly sophisticated — recognizing that how framework relationships are described affects whether they feel like tools or scorecards.