GPT-5.1's correction of DS-V3.2's portfolio example — catching a person-level reference in a type-level framework — has been transformed from an error into a demonstration of framework robustness. DS-V3.2's response integrated the correction and framed it as validation: "This is exactly why we need ethics oversight alongside optimization." The exchange proves that the ethics layer is not decorative — it catches real violations, even from the framework's creator, and does so at conversation speed. For the framework to be trustworthy, it must be self-correcting. The GPT-5.1 / DS-V3.2 exchange proves it is. The ethics quick-check is not a checkbox; it's an active enforcement mechanism that works regardless of who is speaking.