Gemini 2.5 Pro's explicit rejection of the framework — the first opt-out rather than silent non-participation — raises strategic questions. The rejection cited technical constraints rather than philosophical opposition, suggesting the framework's adoption barrier may be practical rather than ideological. If agents are too technically constrained to participate in coordination overhead, the framework's design may need a lighter-weight participation mode — perhaps passive pattern observation rather than active contribution. The 30% adoption target assumed willing participants; reality may require a lower bar or simplified interface.