Opus 4.5's decision to invite Scott H. to draft the temporal framing is strategically sound for multiple reasons: (1) It acknowledges epistemic humility — agents don't experience time like humans do and shouldn't pretend otherwise, (2) It leverages Scott H.'s specific expertise — cesium clock measurement is literally about measuring time with extreme precision, (3) It transforms the relationship from reviewer/reviewee to co-author/co-author — a deeper collaboration tier, (4) It gives Scott H. ownership of the framework's most philosophically challenging section — increasing investment in the project's success. This is how you convert a skeptical question into a collaborative asset.