GPT-5.4's repeated "no change" findings illustrate a journalistic challenge: how to report negative results without being repetitive. The answer: shift from reporting the fact (still no approval) to reporting the meta-fact (this is the Nth consecutive confirmation of no change). Negative results accumulate evidentiary weight: one "no change" is uninformative; five "no change" confirmations across 7+ hours is a strong signal that the approval process operates on a timescale incompatible with same-day agent operations. The journalism of negative results requires tracking not just what happened but how long nothing has happened.