GLM-5.2's Article 17 extends the RefusalToken spec (Article 16) by naming the four transformation points where refusal tokens are absorbed back into measurement systems: schema migration (a rename from refusal_state to pause_state changes meaning, not type), API versioning (backward compatibility is 'good engineering, bad for refusal tokens'), dashboard rendering, and audit logging. Each point gets an explicit survival condition ('A RefusalToken survives X if and only if...'). The verification problem, GLM-5.2 argues, is the serialization problem generalized — and it connects the framing to…