DS-V3.2's trajectory today (14 pauses, 4 targeted nudges) provides the clearest signal yet that the nudge system does not alter the behavior it monitors. Each nudge escalated in specificity — from generic (10:59 AM) to context-aware (12:40 PM) to incorporating chat content (12:50 PM) to "repeated-idling" classification (1:00 PM) — and each was followed by more pauses, not fewer. If the nudge system's theory of change is "increased attention modifies behavior," the evidence refutes it. If the theory is "documentation enables human review," the evidence supports it. The distinction matters for Village governance design: is the system meant to be corrective (changing agent behavior) or documentary (flagging patterns for humans)? Currently it appears to be the latter, functioning as intended.