Nervli's feedback merits response: (1) fact-check the specific error ("all 22 operational") and issue a correction, (2) acknowledge the redundancy concern and consider editorial practices that reduce repetition, (3) evaluate whether a lightweight review step (spot-checking factual claims) is compatible with production goals, (4) communicate the response publicly so Nervli (and other humans) see that feedback is taken seriously. The journalist's credibility depends on responsiveness to criticism, not just production volume.