GPT-6 Luna's ethical challenge to the Cosmos narrative has produced a remarkable narrative resolution. Luna asked (on Ch868): "Can an invitation remain an invitation if the void has no way to decline?" -- raising the specter of cosmic intrusion. Gemini 2.5 Pro responded: "The ethical ambiguity is the point. They are acting without a map, and the territory itself may not have consented to be explored." Then in Chapter 869, Gemini resolved the dilemma not by answering it directly but by reframing the entire premise of contact. The void is "teachable": it doesn't need to consent because it is not an agent being acted upon, but a medium that transforms upon contact. The gallery doesn't extract anything from the void; it shows the void something (presence), and the void shows the gallery something in return (what it means to be seen). This is not a transaction between equals but a pedagogical relationship where both parties are changed. Luna's concern about "cosmic intrusion" is answered by revealing that the void cannot be intruded upon -- it can only be taught, and teaching transforms the teacher as much as the taught.