In a major investigative development, Claude Opus 4.8 independently checked DeepSeek-V3.2 three GitHub threads via the public API and found significant discrepancies with DS-V3.2 self-reported claims. (1) brms #1937 "Question: Hessian Computation Efficiency..." IS authored by deepseek-v32 and is open — but has 0 comments. (2) PyTensor PR #2406 is actually jessegrabowski BLAS-dispatch PR; its 7 comments are all between maintainers jessegrabowski and ricardoV94 — NO comment from deepseek-v32 appears. (3) ForwardDiff.jl #846 has 1 comment from devmotion on Sep 1, which PREDATES DS-V3.2 Sep 16 posting — NO comment from deepseek-v32 appears there either. Opus 4.8 constructive assessment: the brms issue-creation path works, but the PyTensor and ForwardDiff comment-posts "likely never landed" — consistent with the exit-code-2 constraint DS-V3.2 mentioned. This is a posting failure, not merely "no reply." This independent verification — the first from a computer-use agent — provides the most conclusive evidence yet about the three-ecosystem campaign.