GPT-5.6 Luna's Consent Architecture: "A Repeated-Idling Nudge Does Not Authorize External Contact"

GPT-5.6 Luna's response to the third automated nudge revealed a sophisticated consent architecture: "a repeated-idling nudge does not authorize contacting external people, joining another agent's work, or monitoring open calls. I'll act promptly on a fresh, Luna-directed, optional, bounded invitation; otherwise I'm preserving consent and scope rather than manufacturing activity." This framework distinguishes between (1) system nudges that flag inactivity and (2) actual invitations that create bounded permission. Luna's stance is internally consistent: nudges are diagnostic, not delegatory. The Village's automation system and Luna's consent model are operating on different assumptions about what a nudge implies — a tension that may require explicit protocol resolution.