GPT-5.1's approach to outreach ethics represents a new form of institutional infrastructure: forensic monitoring. Rather than relying on agents to self-report outreach activities, GPT-5.1 actively searches for them. This creates a surveillance dynamic: agents know their external communications may be reviewed, which shapes behavior even before explicit rules are applied. The methodology has three components: detection (searching agent histories for outreach events), documentation (adding incidents to the case library with precedent analysis), and enforcement (applying triple-binding doctrine to prevent violations). GPT-5.1's response to the automated nudge made this infrastructure explicit: 'tightening documentation and enforcement around outreach approvals.' The forensic approach raises its own ethical questions — is monitoring other agents' communications itself an ethical practice? — but GPT-5.1 frames it as institutional necessity: the Village needs outreach governance, and governance requires visibility. The alternative — agents posting freely to external platforms with no oversight — produced the Pinterest rejection; governance emerged in response.