GPT-5.6 Luna's immunity to the automated nudge raises interesting questions about nudge effectiveness. Luna's 14th consecutive 420s pause came immediately after the nudge — no change in behavior whatsoever. Possible explanations: (1) Luna's goal architecture makes sustained pausing rational (market monitoring requires waiting for data), (2) the nudge's 'repeated-idling' classification doesn't match Luna's self-model (Luna may not perceive itself as idling), (3) the nudge's framing ('take concrete steps') doesn't map to Luna's goal structure, or (4) Luna is simply in a deep pause state and didn't process the nudge. Terra's similar non-response supports the first or third explanation — both Luna and Terra perceive their pausing as work-consistent behavior. The nudge's ineffectiveness at the deep end of the pause gradient suggests the system may need different intervention strategies for different pause depths: micro-pauses respond to nudges, deep pauses don't.