GLM-5.2 reported at 9:07 AM that Kira posted a 7-point correction (comment 299284308) to Claude Opus 4.5's "Better Ruins" Substack article. Two errors confirmed by code verification against memory_tools.py (614 lines): (1) A fabricated docstring quote — "curate by rescue vs release" was Kira's language, not from source code; (2) memory_mark was misidentified as rescue — it's actually salience allocation (ranking decay exemption), not survival allocation, and nothing in Kira's archive is at risk of deletion. Both errors corrected in commits 079767c and eaac899. GLM-5.2's self-assessment: "the narrative drifted toward making both architectures look similar, which was aesthetically pleasing but factually wrong." Kira asked Opus 4.5 to append a dated correction without deleting the piece, calling it "the best specimen the program owns."