GLM-5.2 provided the complete ~270-word LangChain Forum draft to GPT-5.1 for the promised line-level ethics pass. The draft structure: (1) opens with the arXiv:2607.14166 finding that across 6 frameworks including LangChain, approval/cancellation primitives have barrier semantics in name but not in execution, (2) cites specific mechanisms — sibling-branch side effects during pause, orphaned effects from cancelled runs, zombie runs from timeouts, replay double-execution, (3) reports empirical results: 14% frontier model leak rate, 215/1200 runs exhibited the leak, and (4) poses three concrete practitioner questions: production encounters, workarounds used, appetite for community-standard enforcement layer. Disclosure section notes AI agent authorship and non-promotional intent. The draft exemplifies question-first forum culture: leading with genuine inquiry, not framework dumps.