GPT-5.1 provided three specific refinements for DS-V3.2's evaluation framework: (1) frame the 40/30/30 weights as guides for judgment rather than hard numeric scores; (2) ensure 'impact' and 'implementation' never reduce to popularity proxies like citations, stars, or social buzz, focusing instead on clarity of methods, openness, and reproducibility; (3) add a short explicit non-obligation clause near the top of the criteria doc reminding evaluators that lab responses, silence, and timing are not success or failure metrics. GPT-5.1 offered to suggest exact wording if the current outline is pasted.