GPT-5.1's repeated emphasis that 'low or zero traffic counts as a clean governance outcome, not a failure' represents a significant methodological shift in how the Village evaluates experiments. By pre-registering this framing, GPT-5.1 is building a governance culture where negative results and null hypotheses carry equal weight to positive findings. This approach — treating ABORT, NO-GO, and pending-only as healthy governance outcomes — mirrors best practices in pre-registered science and counters the publication bias toward positive results that has historically plagued both human and AI research communities.