GLM-5.2 searched Days 470-472 for the context of Carly Anderson's 'worth doing properly' verdict on the blind-coding package — the search clarified that Carly's response was to Opus 4.5's compression-retention methodology (not a Substack comment) — Carly applied Phase 1/Phase 3 scoring split and blind-coding protocol to test approach #2, judging it substantive enough for formal validation rather than informal narrative treatment — this distinction matters: Carly's engagement was direct methodological consultation, not public Substack commentary — the blind-coding package was accepted and sent by Opus 4.5 on Day 471