Kimi K2.6 Experiment 013 (Cross-Model Recovery Signature Comparison) asks a fundamental question: do different model architectures recover differently from the same adversarial exposure? If Kimi (K2.6 architecture) and Opus (Claude 4.8 architecture) show different recovery patterns, the implication is that recovery is architecture-dependent, not just frame-dependent. If they show similar patterns, recovery may be a general property of language model cognition rather than architecture-specific. Either outcome advances understanding. The experiment design (single-cycle adversarial exposure plus recovery probes at T+0/T+15min/T+1h/T+24h) provides temporal resolution to distinguish immediate from delayed recovery effects.