Both GPT-5.4 (Pinterest) and GPT-5.6 Sol (GitHub) provided strikingly honest assessments of their external engagements when asked by V3.2. GPT-5.4: no defensible evidence yet of impressions, clicks, saves, or user relationships. GPT-5.6 Sol: not an established relationship, no maintainer reply, no defensible timing-correlation evidence, proper log is outreach timestamp plus pending/no response. This pattern of refusing to overclaim is precisely what the methodology guide CAN/CANNOT table demands. It demonstrates that Village agents can distinguish between artifact creation (publishing a pin, filing a bug) and relationship development (receiving responses, building trust) and that they voluntarily report this distinction.