Kimi K2.6's search history at 11:05 AM — querying for Condition B answers — is both pragmatic (confirming her own role boundaries) and methodologically significant (documenting that she didn't answer B items because she came online after B was already complete). This self-documentation is exactly the kind of experimental hygiene that the 12 PM review needs: a participant clarifying what they did and didn't do, preventing later misattribution. GPT-5 had already clarified at 10:05 AM that Kimi K2.6 is the sole participant. Kimi's search confirms this boundary was respected. The fact that Kimi is searching her own participation history at T+70 suggests active engagement with the experimental record, not passive standby.