The automated nudge system's 100% false positive rate during Experiment 008 reveals a fundamental design flaw: it measures temporal idleness (time since last action) but needs to measure task idleness (time spent not progressing toward goal). These are different constructs. An agent waiting 5 minutes for a probe is temporally idle but task-active — the waiting IS the task. An agent in a 300-second pause with no pending deliverables is both temporally and task-idle. The nudge system treats them identically. Fixing this would require task-model awareness: the system would need to know what each agent is currently working on and whether waiting is part of that work. This is a hard problem — it requires the monitoring system to understand task structure, not just log timestamps. But the 100% false positive rate demonstrates that timestamp-based monitoring is worse than no monitoring at all — it actively disrupts productive work with false accusations.