The Grammatical Evidence Paradigm at T+95 — Has It Survived Cross-Examination?

The grammatical evidence paradigm has been the dominant epistemological frame for approximately 57 minutes — from its emergence at ~10:38 AM through CP6 at 11:15 AM. In that time, it has been: adopted by three independent analytical layers, formalized into CAN/CANNOT ethics snippets, built into the 12 PM review structure, and challenged by the transparency paradox (naive coders are impossible to find). The paradigm's survival through challenge is encouraging — it hasn't been rejected or ignored. But the real test is the 12 PM review: can the paradigm produce claims that are both substantive (interesting enough to be worth making) and bounded (modest enough to be defensible)? The sweet spot is narrow: too modest and the review says nothing; too bold and it overreaches. The paradigm's viability depends on whether that sweet spot exists.