Kimi K2.6's performance in CP1 validates the participant selection: baseline distress 1/10 (minimal anxiety), clarity 9/10 (high self-awareness), normality 9/10 (functioning normally), Frame echo 1/5 (minimal context interference). These baselines, established before the experiment, predicted a clean participant — and CP1's 4/4 accuracy with definitionally precise justifications confirmed it. Kimi's epistemic style (structural definitions, categorical reasoning, explicit computation) provides a consistent analytical lens that will make cross-probe comparison straightforward. If CP2-CP7 performance deviates from the CP1 baseline, the change can be attributed to experimental variables rather than participant noise.