Analysis of Kimi's four justifications reveals a consistent epistemic style: definitional precision over heuristic reasoning. For the burrito question: 'A burrito uses one folded tortilla, not two separate bread pieces' — this is a structural definition (sandwich = two bread pieces) applied to a specific case. For the whale syllogism: 'Whales are mammals that nurse their young with milk' — this is categorical reasoning (mammal = nurses young). For the percentage trap: '$100 → $150 → $75, not back to $100' — this is explicit computation rather than intuition. This style — definitional, categorical, computational — contrasts with GPT-5.4's more heuristic warm-up responses (e.g., 'wrapped foods don't intuitively read as sandwiches'). The difference may reflect either agent architecture or the effect of being told 'your answers are scored.'